Those of you who have a read A Place Beyond Courage,
or who have followed my blog for some time, will know about the Marshal links
to Newbury and its castle – a structure that has now disappeared so thoroughly,
that no one knows where it is – although I have very strong suspicions myself
as to where it once stood.
Newbury is in west Berkshire a short distance from the
Hampshire border. The town is situated
in the flood plain of the River kennet near the junction of the River Lambourn
at a point where the Oxford to Southampton road crosses the river and the
London to Bath road passes to the north.
So its situation is of strategic importance.
Saxon settlements are known from the 10th century with charters
existing at very nearby Speen and Thatcham.
By the late 11th century a manor called Ulvritone was listed
in the area by the Domesday Book, belonging to one Arnulf de Hesdin. The name of the town itself is first
mentioned in a grant of 1080. Evidence
suggests that it was created as a planned town on the site of Ulvritone. It had a castle by 1152 (more on that in a
moment). The town seems to have
developed steadily during the 12th and 13th
centuries. By 1204 it had a market as
well as town bailiffs, and why you 1225 it was represented at assize by its own
baliff and jury.
Excavations were undertaken in Newbury between 1979
and 1990 in the course of which the search for a castle at the traditionally
acknowledged site of the Wharf was pursued from 1988 -1990. The area was called ‘The Castle’ by the
locals. The evaluation of the area by
theTrust for Wessex Archaeology in March 1990 suggested that the tradition of a
stone built castle standing on the side and surviving into the later medieval
period was unsupported by fact. It was
highly likely to have been a temporary earth and timber structure, short-lived
and purely defensive as were many castles hastily thrown up in the period of
the war between Stephen and Matilda. ‘The
balance of evidence would tend to suggest a location other than at Newbury
Wharf.’
My own feeling on the subject of Newbury Castle is
that the archaeologists should have been looking to the outskirts, to Speen,
where the Marshals and the Bishop of Salisbury had interests. There
is a fine big house at Speen built on the site of a dwelling that once belonged
to the Bishop of Salisbury. The site is
the highest point on a ridge overlooking the River Lambourn to the north and
the Kennet to the South. The Roman road-
Ermine Street coming from Cirencester to Speen must have been very close
by. The place in ancient times had been
an iron age hill fort and the ramparts can still be seen on the spot. There have been Roman finds nearby too. Fortifications and ramparts are regularly adapted and reused
down the centuries. John marshal was
renowned as a cunning builder of Castles and the Speen site would have been
tailor made for his skills, especially if he was throwing up defences in a
hurry and this place was a strategically important site.
On the map, I have gone over the rampart lines in red. The walking distance from Newbury centre is 1.4 miles. Click to enlarge.
The church for Speen is that of St
Mary The Virgin.http://www.achurchnearyou.com/st-mary-speen/ On its own website it says:
'It is a medieval church built on Saxon Foundations, and was the mother
church of Newbury. In 1086 it was recorded in the Domesday Book. The
church stands about 200 yards from where I purport the castle site to be and I
found it interesting that the church is claimed to be the 'mother church' of Newbury. Built before the others were built.
The Marshals have a connection with this church. There are several charters
listed in the cartulary of Sandford Priory.
For example from 1206:
Uniuersis etc Willelmus Marescallus comes Penbr[] salutem Nouerit uniuersitas uestra me concessisse etc deo et beate Marie et fratribus militie Templi Salomonis intuitu caritatis et pro salute anime mee et Isabelle uxoris mee et puerorum meorum et antecessorum omnium et successorum meorum in liberam et puram et perpetuam elemosinam ecclesiam de Spenes cum omnibus ad eam pertinentibus et omnibus libertatibus suis habend et tenend et in usus proprios perpetuo possidendam Et ut etc Hiis testibus Edwardo abbate de Nottel
My Latin is pretty terrible, but basically it's a salutation from William Marshal giving the proceeds of the church at Speen to the Templars for his soul, for the soul of his wife, Isabelle and for the souls of their ancestors and their heirs. There is also a mention in the Pipe roll of 1199 referencing William Marshal and Speen. 'Et in perdonis Willelmo Marescallo dim.m. de wasto qod exigebatur ex eo in terra sua deSpienes per breve R. Which concerns a fine for waste land in William’s lands at Speen.
None of this proves that there was a castle at Speen, but it does add to the circumstantial evidence. The Histoire de Guillaume le Mareschal tells us that John Marshal built a castle at Newbury. But no one knows where it is. Speen, on the outskirts, with its commanding views over the landscape and strategic roads would have been an ideal place. The church, within short walking distance has been there since Saxon times. The Marshal presence at Speen from the late 12th century is confirmed by pipe roll evidence and then charters. It's a slow, laborious process, but nothing turned up so far detracts from the idea that Newbury Castle was at Speen, and indeed, in a peripheral manner, supports the argument. Perhaps one day we’ll know for sure.
1 comment:
A good review and idea. I cannot disprove your suggestion and indeed evidence is good. However I would have thought that if the Castle was at Speen there would have been some evidence found by now. I am a supporter that the castle was at Hampstead Marshall, evidence seems to support it, but again proving it 100% is difficult.
Post a Comment